It's just Gossip. You can download the ethical position for clinicians on their website in PDF format and just about all blood fractions are allowed for the members. Nothing has changed or will change. WT is trying hard to make the blood policy a conscience matter. They are not about to take two step backwards at this point. Any changes would have been put on the website first.
I believe in overlapping
JoinedPosts by I believe in overlapping
-
41
New Blood policy for JW medical professionals?
by FreeAgent inhey folks, .
it’s been a long time since i’ve posted, good to see the forum well attended & spicy as ever.
this just in from a close & trusted source, names & local places redacted for obvious reasons:.
-
-
I believe in overlapping
-
39
Mandatory Vaccinations...are you for or against ??
by minimus inthere’s now a measles outbreak.
there is a jewish sect in new york that refuses vaccines.
some parents do not want their children vaccinated..
-
-
I believe in overlapping
Does the View think vaccinations are necessary??
It's easier to explain the "Views" of these;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MKF0PzmPY14
Than the "View" of these;
-
39
Mandatory Vaccinations...are you for or against ??
by minimus inthere’s now a measles outbreak.
there is a jewish sect in new york that refuses vaccines.
some parents do not want their children vaccinated..
-
-
I believe in overlapping
Twitter is going crazy today.
Meghan McCain took a break from her The View hiatus to deliver a terse message to “abominable” anti-vaxxers.
Meghan McCain ✔ @MeghanMcCainDear anti-vaxers, your stupidity and arrogance are putting the lives of children in danger! It is nothing short of abominable.
https://youtu.be/Wfl-uMVbNn8?t=179
https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/meghan-mccain-message-anti-vaxxers-140223313.html
-
19
So Many People Are Overly Emotional and Acting Crazy Spoiled!
by minimus inyouths in school have meltdowns anytime someone “offends” them.
grownups at a dinner table flip out on each other over politics.
drivers are ready to smash each other up if someone disrespects them on the road.
-
-
I believe in overlapping
zeb
and Im curious what the hell are the chanters at college/university for? They should consider themselves damn lucky they can go to college.
I agree.
What has happened is that this generation of youths that are taking their place among the living, are under the impression that they are entitled to be inherently deserving of privileges or special treatment. They truly believe that the world should revolve around them. They don't considered the hard work and sacrifice it took from previous generations to get to this point.
I sometimes feel embarrassed that I'm part of this generation.
-
19
So Many People Are Overly Emotional and Acting Crazy Spoiled!
by minimus inyouths in school have meltdowns anytime someone “offends” them.
grownups at a dinner table flip out on each other over politics.
drivers are ready to smash each other up if someone disrespects them on the road.
-
-
I believe in overlapping
This is the result of the first amendment being attacked. It started a few years ago in College Campuses and is picking up momentum in all areas of society.
Congress shall make no law respecting ……. prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech
Anti-first amendment- anti-free speech activities started in College Campuses. Administrative cowardice bred the ideology that provided the impetus to physical violence instead of healthy debate.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H-dKiDybMcE
To understand what is happening, it’s necessary to explore the ideology that provides the impetus for a lot of the protestors who violently obstruct debates, assault speakers, students and professors.
Also we need to understand why professors are not stepping up and stopping these students who are engaged in these types of violent actions in order to stop speakers who try to convey an idea that does not align with their views.
Here is one argument that the advocates of violence and anti-free speech make.
A: the validity or invalidity of an argument can be judge solely by the ethic, sexual racial or culture identity of the person making the argument.
For example the reasoning is that straight white Americans are inheritably the beneficiaries of white privilege and therefore cannot speak on certain policies, since they have not experience what it is like to be black, Hispanic, transgender, gay or a woman.
This philosophy ranks the value of the view, not base on the logic or merit of the view, but on the level of victimization in American Society experienced by the person exposing the view.
Therefore if you are a LGBT black woman, your view of American Society is automatically more valuable that a straight white male.
Any argument that attacks this philosophy is considered micro-aggression and should be immediately stopped even if it includes violence to stop such speech.
http://www.glaad.org/sites/default/files/styles/750px/public/images/2015-11/1_Kita.jpg?itok=6KwkvD1e
http://www.glaad.org/sites/default/files/styles/750px/public/images/2015-11/1_Maya.jpg?itok=rwiz9iXu
https://record.goshen.edu/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/Micro3_BSU_web.jpg
This destroys Free Speech!
Also it turns students into snowflakes and pathetic, looking for an excuse to be offended.
A healthy nation requires an emotional and intellectually vigorous population ready to engage in open debate at all times. Shielding college students from opposing viewpoints make them weaker and more dangerous and laying a fertile ground for a civil war.
All of our views should be judged on their merits and not on the color, sex, or sexual orientation of the speaker,
And those views should never be banned on the grounds that THEY OFFEND SOMEONE
The first step to a civil war is an attack on Free speech because it promotes violence instead of open debate.
-
15
What's the point?
by Incognigo Montoya init has always baffled me, if earth and it's inhabitants, are god's sole sentient creation (aside from the angel's and demons) along with the animal life, why create such a vast galaxy, along with billions of other galaxies, with their trillions of stars and planets, etc.
what's the point?
our galaxy surely would've been enough, in a great void of blackness.
-
-
I believe in overlapping
but ultimately, any life outside of our world would completely change the premise upon which christianity is founded. If there isn't, why go to such elaborate lengths to create so much?
It’s only been about 116 years since the Wright brothers made their brief flights with the first powered aircraft. The plane flew at 30 MPH. About 134 years before that, the first car was invented but it wasn’t mass produced for the average citizen until the 1900s.
People in ancient times never traveled more than a few miles from home in any direction. Only the affluent could afford horses or camels. Since most people either grew their own food or lived near farmers from whom they could buy or barter for food, they had little need to travel.
So most people had no idea “Who” lived in other countries—if there was such a thing as other people living in other parts of the earth.
Consider the fact that it took Moses and about 3 million people 40 years to get from Egypt to the promise land (about 250 miles.) Today that is kind of laughable considering we can make such a trip in about 45 minutes via flight without God’s help and any need of manna to sustain us.🛩
We have learned that there are trillions upon trillions of habitable planets in the Universe. So why haven’t we seen any alien civilizations?💆
The reason is because our technology hasn’t advance to a point where we can travel immense distances in space in a short period of time.
We are like Moses traveling to the promise land, (a distance of 250 miles) in 40 years. Their position in the spectrum of travel was still at the very bottom. We are not at the very bottom, but at the same time we are not even close to half in the spectrum of fast travel. As a human species we need to figure how to jump long distances in a small amount of time.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=scBY3cVyeyA
When that time finally arrives, Christianity will be just another idea that will fade into the past, just like Zeus, Thor, and all the Greek Gods that lived on Mt. Olympus.
And if as a species we make it that far and don’t kill ourselves, I think we will find other intelligent species.
How they receive us is another story and it might not be very welcoming since we will be the Illegal-immigrants invading their world and their culture.
http://atlantablackstar.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Haitian-Immigrants-1.jpg
-
18
Should illegal immigrants be sent “Only” to Sanctuary Cities?
by I believe in overlapping inpro-illegal immigration advocates are fighting president trump’s efforts to keep illegal immigrants out of the united states.
trump wants immigrants to enter the usa legally and in a controlled manner so as not to tax the local economies of their resources that will burden the local law abiding citizens.
“pro illegal immigrant’s advocates insist that illegal immigrants are overwhelmingly good people fleeing bad circumstances in poverty-stricken, gang-ridden or war-torn countries.
-
-
I believe in overlapping
I say if they wanted them before, send all of them to those locations. They won't be getting any tax revenue off of those folks, and they will be using all their resources. My only question would be how long will they hold out before crying "Uncle".
I would say, not more than 6 months top- for them to cry uncle.They just need a little taste of their own medicine.
-
18
Should illegal immigrants be sent “Only” to Sanctuary Cities?
by I believe in overlapping inpro-illegal immigration advocates are fighting president trump’s efforts to keep illegal immigrants out of the united states.
trump wants immigrants to enter the usa legally and in a controlled manner so as not to tax the local economies of their resources that will burden the local law abiding citizens.
“pro illegal immigrant’s advocates insist that illegal immigrants are overwhelmingly good people fleeing bad circumstances in poverty-stricken, gang-ridden or war-torn countries.
-
-
I believe in overlapping
silentbuddha
Put them in San Francisco and tell them if they travel outside the cities boundaries before their case is heard they will be instantly sent packing
I like that Idea!
-
18
Should illegal immigrants be sent “Only” to Sanctuary Cities?
by I believe in overlapping inpro-illegal immigration advocates are fighting president trump’s efforts to keep illegal immigrants out of the united states.
trump wants immigrants to enter the usa legally and in a controlled manner so as not to tax the local economies of their resources that will burden the local law abiding citizens.
“pro illegal immigrant’s advocates insist that illegal immigrants are overwhelmingly good people fleeing bad circumstances in poverty-stricken, gang-ridden or war-torn countries.
-
-
-
18
Should illegal immigrants be sent “Only” to Sanctuary Cities?
by I believe in overlapping inpro-illegal immigration advocates are fighting president trump’s efforts to keep illegal immigrants out of the united states.
trump wants immigrants to enter the usa legally and in a controlled manner so as not to tax the local economies of their resources that will burden the local law abiding citizens.
“pro illegal immigrant’s advocates insist that illegal immigrants are overwhelmingly good people fleeing bad circumstances in poverty-stricken, gang-ridden or war-torn countries.
-
-
I believe in overlapping
Pro-illegal immigration advocates are fighting President Trump’s efforts to keep illegal immigrants out of the United States.
Trump wants immigrants to enter the USA LEGALLY and in a controlled manner so as not to tax the local economies of their resources that will burden the local law abiding citizens.
“Pro Illegal immigrant’s advocates insist that ILLEGAL immigrants are overwhelmingly good people fleeing bad circumstances in poverty-stricken, gang-ridden or war-torn countries. They insist that Illegal immigrants commit less crime per person than do U.S. citizens. They annoyingly persist in unsubstantiated claims that Illegal immigrants pay taxes and are a net benefit to the economy. According to pro-advocates, Illegal immigrants are needed for the U.S. workforce, and to do jobs that Americans are unwilling to do. Pro-advocates continue to insist that Illegal immigration is not the cause of our drug problems and we should not worry about human trafficking.”
Anti-illegal immigration advocates say:
“Illegal immigrants are a net drain on the economy and cost money. U.S. labor needs can be fulfilled by legal immigrants. Illegal immigrants are exploited and paid substandard wages, often under the table, hurting the market for American workers. They bring illnesses and contagious diseases. Illegal immigration makes our drug problems worse and creates a market for human trafficking.”
Here’s a thought;
“This problem is actually very simple to solve and it doesn’t require litigating in court whose view is correct. It merely accepts the stated view of each side.”
President Trump is telling illegal immigration supporters; I hear you and am giving you the chance to practice your advocacy. You will receive all the benefits you foresee from illegal immigrants.
At the same time, Trump is telling illegal immigration opponents; I hear you and will not force you to bear what you see as costs to your communities.
There are consequences to whichever side is wrong, and that’s not a bad thing, either. Those communities that shun illegal immigrants will not receive the benefits, if it turns out they exist.
On the other hand, those who welcome illegal immigrants will have to bear the costs or other negative consequences, if it turns out that they were wrong in their assessment.
"So with this in mind, sanctuary cities and states should want to do all they can to keep illegal immigrants from being sent to less welcoming places -- and welcome them to their home area. The best places for the immigrants’ welfare would seem to be where local policies and laws favor them. For example, where they can receive driver’s licenses, social welfare benefits, in-state or free college tuition and free medical health services, and free housing at the cost of ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION---PRO-ADVOCATES who are resisting the President’s efforts to bring in immigrants into the United States –LEGALLY.
.
Within a year, there’s a pretty good chance we would be able to see which side of the issue is closer to being correct. Pro-Illegal immigration or Anti-Illegal immigration.
My OP Question;
Should illegal immigrants be sent to Sanctuary Cities only.
What do you think?
